THE GOOD: The 2017 Kia Niro is good for up to 50 mpg combined. There’s plenty of room for cargo in the spacious cabin and it has a solid suite of optional driver aid tech. Even without options, the UVO dashboard tech is fully-featured and boasts Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.
THE BAD: Trim levels with access to better amenities and safety tech get lower fuel economy than the base model. The USB port doesn’t supply enough electricity to charge a phone while using Android Auto. The hybrid system experienced an odd hesitation in stop-and-go traffic.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Don’t judge this book by its dull cover; the 2017 Kia Niro quietly boasts very respectable hybrid performance. Stick to the midtier trim levels for the best blend of economy, technology and price.
The Kia Niro hybrid didn’t make a very good first impression when it arrived at Roadshow HQ. That’s partially because our tester was a base-model Niro FE with the very base level of amenities, technologies and trim available. That it sported generic silver paint with gray trim and plastic wheel covers didn’t help keep this car from looking like a throwback to the cheap cars that Kia built in the early 2000s.
But then I spent a week with the Niro and learned that maybe I shouldn’t have judged this book by its cover. Get to know the Niro and it reveals itself as a thrifty, capable and easy-to-live-with car. The fuel economy is actually quite good; the spacious cabin makes short work of Ikea and Costco-sized loads; and the tech, even at the base FE level, is surprisingly well-sorted.
Hybrid power plant
The Niro is powered by the same 1.6-liter Kappa gas-electric hybrid power plant that you’ll find beneath the hood of its cousin, the Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid. The direct-injected gasoline engine makes 104 horsepower and 109 pound-feet of torque, while the electric motor brings 43 horsepower and 125 pound-feet of torque to the party. Total output for the system is stated at 139 horsepower and 195 pound-feet of torque.
Power for the e-motor is stored in a 1.56 kWh (6.4Ah) lithium-ion polymer battery. For now, the Niro is not a plug-in hybrid, so it recharges its battery from a combination of regenerative braking and surplus energy generated by the gasoline engine.
Also like the Ioniq, the Niro makes use of a six-speed dual clutch gearbox to send power to the front wheels, rather than the continuously variable transmission that most hybridsuse. The automaker claims this novel configuration yields benefits for drivability and economy. However, I think it’s also to blame for some awkward hesitation I experienced in stop-and-go traffic; my theory being that the gas-electric transition of the engine doesn’t always mesh with the clutch-actuated shifts when creeping at very low speeds. I experienced a similar phenomenon when testing the Ioniq.
Aside from the occasional stutter, the Niro’s hybrid engines and quick gearbox made smooth and mostly responsive work of city speed driving. The default drive mode is an Eco program, so it quickly upshifts when approaching highway speed to preserve fuel, which makes it feel a bit less lively on the interstate.
Near the end of my testing, I found a setting tucked in the instrument cluster’s menu that allowed me to select a Sport program that really wakes the hybrid system up. In this mode, the throttle becomes significantly more responsive and the Niro starts to feel downright quick when accelerating from a stop. However, using this mode cost me a few miles per gallon.
Speaking of mpg, the EPA estimates the Kia Niro FE at 52 city, 49 highway and 50 combined mpg. That 50 mpg magic number puts the Niro just short of the 56 mpg Toyota Prius Eco and the 58 mpg Hyundai Ioniq Blue. It’s still an impressive showing considering the Niro is basically a small SUV with a less uber-aerodynamic design than these two hatchbacks. In fact, the Niro was penned to look as un-hybrid-like as possible.
For the slight eco trade-off, the Niro does have the advantage of more overall cargo capacity — it’s downright cavernous with the rear seats folded — and a higher, more commanding ride height and view of the road. During my week of testing, which included lots of highway miles loaded up with cargo while helping a friend move, I averaged 48.1 mpg.
The aforementioned numbers are, I should note, specific to the FE, since it’s lighter than the more fully equipped trim levels. Step up to the EX model and the economy drops to 49 mpg combined while the fully loaded (and, honestly, much better-looking) Touring model drops to just 43 combined mpg. So, I can sort of see why Kia sent us the stripped-down model. Still, it’s a bit annoying to know that potential buyers who want a bit more creature comfort will not only pay more up front, but also more in fuel over the life of the vehicle.
Though the Niro just barely loses to the Prius at the pump, its UVO cabin tech blows the Toyota’s offerings out of the water.
Even at the base level, the Niro FE hybrid comes packing a 7-inch UVO touchscreen infotainment system with a thoroughly modern list of digital media options and sources. There’s satellite radio (subscription required), USB and iPod connectivity, Bluetooth for hands-free calling and audio streaming and more.
Through Kia’s UVO e-Services, the Niro gains remote convenience features, emergency assistance and a selection of native app integrations.
If that’s not enough, the base system also features standard Android Auto and AppleCarPlay connectivity, so you can bring your Google or Apple Maps on the road along with dozens of audio streaming apps for music, news, podcasts, audiobooks and other digital options. Just plug your compatible smartphone into the USB port and follow the onscreen prompts.
That USB port is the source of one minor tech annoyance for me. When connected to my, it didn’t provide enough power to the phone to positively charge the device while connected and using navigation. So, I’d end every trip with a lower battery level than I’d started with. I tested with a and got the same results. This has been a known thing with Hyundai/Kia receivers among Android Auto enthusiasts for some time now, so it’s disappointing to see that it’s still an issue.
Though not available on the base FE model, there is an optional navigation system available to buyers of the top Touring trim level using the same UVO mapping and voice command software we’ve seen throughout the rest of Kia’s line.
Driver aid tech
The most advanced driver safety system on our base FE model was the standard rear camera and the six advanced airbags. Like the dashboard tech, this is about as basic as it comes.
However, stepping up to the higher trim levels unlocks additional features and option packages. The LX and better models gain blind-spot monitoring with lane change assist and rear cross-traffic alerts. The next step-up EX model gets an optional $2,300 package that adds forward collision warning, lane-keeping steering assist, automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection and adaptive cruise control. Finally, the top-tier Touring models gain standard front and rear proximity detection at parking speeds.
All said, the list of available features is well-sorted and satisfactory. However, the tiered organization of Kia’s options list, requiring a step up to heavier trim levels and a step down to lower fuel economy, seems to force drivers to choose whether to be as thrifty as possible or as safe as possible.
Pricing and competition
The 2017 Kia Niro FE starts at $22,890 (before an $895 destination charge) which is actually a surprisingly affordable sticker for a 50-mpg compact SUV with a solid suite of dashboard technology.
The sweet spot of the lineup includes the LX and EX trims, gaining a healthy dose of amenities and creature comforts and unlocking the optional driver aid suites while only dropping down to 49 combined mpg. My personal recommendation is EX with Advanced Technology Package with its MSRP of $29,290 including options and destination charges.
I’d think twice before stepping up to the Touring trim level. Loaded up with its Tech Package at $32,445, the Touring trim level doesn’t gain much over the EX but takes the biggest economy hit at 46 mpg combined.
And for goodness sake, no matter what trim level you pick, make sure to get it in any color but that dull “Rental Car Silver” that our tester wore.
Theand the are the Niro’s main competitors, both boasting much better fuel economy, but a bit less cargo space. Ford’s model also competes in this space, nearly matching the Kia on cargo capacity, price and fuel economy.
Engine4 Cylinder Engine
DrivetrainFront Wheel Drive
Transmission6-Speed A/T, A/T, Transmission w/Dual Shift Mode
BRAKING & HANDLING
BrakesABS, 4-Wheel Disc Brakes
TiresTire Pressure Monitor
WheelsAluminum Wheels, Wheel Covers
AudioSatellite Radio, AM/FM Stereo, Auxiliary Audio Input, MP3 Player, Smart Device Integration
LocksKeyless Entry, Power Door Locks
MirrorsPower Mirror(s), Passenger Illuminated Visor Mirror, Driver Illuminated Vanity Mirror, Driver Vanity Mirror, Passenger Vanity Mirror
TechIntermittent Wipers, Variable Speed Intermittent Wipers, Automatic Headlights, Steering Wheel Audio Controls, Adjustable Steering Wheel, Bluetooth Connection, Trip Computer, Cruise Control, Security System, Back-Up Camera, Engine Immobilizer
Safety FeaturesBrake Assist, Daytime Running Lights, Stability Control, Traction Control, Child Safety Locks
Air BagsFront Head Air Bag, Front Side Air Bag, Driver Air Bag, Rear Head Air Bag, Passenger Air Bag, Passenger Air Bag Sensor, Knee Air Bag
Air ConditioningMulti-Zone A/C, A/C, Climate Control
Seat TrimCloth Seats
WindowsRear Defrost, Privacy Glass, Power Windows
SeatsBucket Seats, Rear Bench Seat, Pass-Through Rear Seat
Wheelbase (in)106.3 in
Length,Overall (in)171.5 in
Height,Overall (in)60.4 in
Base Curb Weight (lbs)3106 lbs
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)11.9
EPA ClassificationSmall Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD